3 8 Vs 5 16 Hose

Related Post:

3 8 Vs 5 16 Hose It had the 5 16 fuel system but I had to replace the gas tank and could only get a 3 8 sending unit I tried to use the 5 16 hose to go over the 3 8 unit but it never really worked

I m pretty sure that can vary in fuel hose for either inside diameter I don t want to get tossed overboard but would get the 5 16 if there is a choice Want good tight clamps I have a 383 in the car which will stay and I have 5 16 lines installed I am going to replace the entire fuel system so I am wondering if I should go with the larger 3 8 line from

3 8 Vs 5 16 Hose

[img_alt-1]

3 8 Vs 5 16 Hose
[img-1]

[img_alt-2]

[img_title-2]
[img-2]

[img_alt-3]

[img_title-3]
[img-3]

Your engine will run fine on either 5 16 or 3 8 line If you had a V6 the 3 8 line would be required Unlikely you should need to reprime the fuel hose bulb during the same The numbers work out to a 5 16 line having 69 of the volume capability of a 3 8 line Personally I switched to an electric fuel pump in the tank AND a 3 8 fuel line I should be

Buy a fuel pressure tester or a gauge and a few feet of fuel hose route it up between the hood and cowl or fender wrap a cloth around the gauge use some tape zip ties to keep it positioned so you or a passenger can read it They have a built in hose barb fitting for the inlet and an inverted flare outlet port that accepts the pump to carb line Go with the 3 8 There is no draw back to running a it as

More picture related to 3 8 Vs 5 16 Hose

[img_alt-4]

[img_title-4]
[img-4]

[img_alt-5]

[img_title-5]
[img-5]

[img_alt-6]

[img_title-6]
[img-6]

Unless you re doing EFI where 3 8 is recommended 5 16 will flow plenty for even wild street applications You might want to look into copper nickel lines They don t rust and they re easier to flare than stainless I have a 1988 110 HP From the fuel tank to the motor is the supply hose or connecter an issue Will the motor run the same with a 5 16 or 3 8 fuel

If running all new fuel lines and using a Pallnet rail why is it recommended to use 3 8 fuel feed line instead of 5 16 Are there really any benefits The orifice from return lines to tank is 1 16 This maintains a back pressure in the return lines 2 PSI back to the IP The return line to tank from tee is 5 16 Normal setup on

[img_alt-7]

[img_title-7]
[img-7]

[img_alt-8]

[img_title-8]
[img-8]

[img_title-1]
3 8 Or 5 16 Fuel Line Differences Vintage Mustang Forums

https://www.vintage-mustang.com › threads
It had the 5 16 fuel system but I had to replace the gas tank and could only get a 3 8 sending unit I tried to use the 5 16 hose to go over the 3 8 unit but it never really worked

[img_title-2]
New Fuel Line Assembly 3 8 Or 5 16 Does It Matter

https://forums.iboats.com › threads
I m pretty sure that can vary in fuel hose for either inside diameter I don t want to get tossed overboard but would get the 5 16 if there is a choice Want good tight clamps


[img_alt-9]

[img_title-9]

[img_alt-7]

[img_title-7]

[img_alt-10]

[img_title-10]

[img_alt-11]

[img_title-11]

[img_alt-12]

[img_title-12]

[img_alt-7]

[img_title-13]

[img_alt-13]

[img_title-13]

[img_alt-14]

[img_title-14]

[img_alt-15]

[img_title-15]

[img_alt-16]

[img_title-16]

3 8 Vs 5 16 Hose - Your engine will run fine on either 5 16 or 3 8 line If you had a V6 the 3 8 line would be required Unlikely you should need to reprime the fuel hose bulb during the same